Saturday, October 18, 2014

Colonel Parker Meets Sinatra

Colonel Tom Parker did a lot of things right for his client, Elvis Presley, especially in the first decade of the King’s career.  He was a shrewd negotiator who always got “his boy” top dollar and red-carpet treatment.  Parker rarely met his match and almost always got his way, but once in a while he over-reached. 

The following excerpt from Channeling Elvis: How Television Saved the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll describes one notable confrontation between the Colonel and one of the few stars who reached the same heights that Elvis did:  Frank Sinatra. 

“Perhaps inevitably, it was a confrontation between Sinatra and Colonel Parker that proved perhaps more memorable than his duet with Elvis. It seems that the Fontainebleau Hotel did not have enough seats to permit all of its guests to attend the taping of the show. Most of them would be given to VIPs or, through the Colonel, to Presley’s fan club members in order to ensure the King a friendly and enthusiastic crowd. To avoid squabbles among guests over any remaining tickets, the hotel decided to patch the taping into its closed-circuit television system so that all guests could watch it in the comfort of their rooms. When the Colonel got wind of this, he demanded that his boy receive additional compensation.

“The unpleasant task of breaking this news to Sinatra fell to Jim Washburn, who remembers having ‘several problems with Parker. I found out that the hotel had almost completed their closed-circuit system, where they could feed the show to every room. The manager there wanted more tickets for the residents of the hotel, and we didn’t have that many seats, so I authorized our engineers to hook up their system so they could get this stuff in the rooms. Colonel Parker heard about it—and we’re already paying Elvis a hideous amount of money—and he said, “I want another $2,000 because of this dumb hookup.” I went in to see Frank, who was shaving, and I said, “Frank, the Colonel wants another two because of this.”  Frank just put down the razor and, still in his bathrobe, went down the elevator with me and went up to the Colonel and said “You and the hillbilly, out of here!”’  In a rare instance of backing down, ‘the Colonel said “Hey, wait a minute. I’m just kidding the kid [Washburn].”  Frank just looked at him and said “Don’t kid the kid.”  Frank was a little pissed.’ It was a rare failure of Parker brinkmanship and uncharacteristic of him to back down to anyone, even Frank Sinatra. Perhaps they were both bluffing, or maybe Parker was simply proving that nothing got by him.”

Channeling Elvis on Amazon:  http://tinyurl.com/mhyaouz
      and in the U.K.http://tinyurl.com/kyolbnm

Amazon Authors Pagehttp://tinyurl.com/po638bd

Please "Like" The Author’s Facebook Page:  http://tinyurl.com/pofg47v


Monday, October 13, 2014

Meeting Colonel Parker


Elvis Presley’s final television appearance, Elvis in Concert, which aired after his death in 1977, remains one of the most controversial events in the King’s career.  Filmed at two concerts less than two months before Presley died, Elvis in Concert preserves Elvis’ poor physical condition at the time and those closest to him objected to it being aired.  They, and many Elvis fans, consider it humiliating and an unflattering coda to an otherwise brilliant performing career.  It has not been seen on television since 1978 and has never been released on home video, although collectors have owned unauthorized copies of the special and the two concerts for many years.  The debate continues as to whether the special should be officially released after so many years, or relegated to the bootleg netherworld and, perhaps, best forgotten.

It is interesting to revisit the origins of the special, which was largely the work of Elvis’ legendary manager, Colonel Tom Parker.  He and Elvis had often turned to television as a way to boost Elvis’ career whenever his stock seemed to be falling and it had often done wonders for him.  The King never seemed more in need of such help than in the closing months of his life and the Colonel again reached out to television, this time more in desperation than genius. 

In the following excerpt from my book, Channeling Elvis: How Television Saved the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll, producer Gary Smith describes his first production meeting with the Colonel and recalls a very odd, somewhat comical incident that took place. 

* * * *

“There were even press rumors that Colonel Parker was trying to sell Presley’s contract. Whether serious or not, Parker realized his star was reaching the end of the line and kept him working to pay the bills before the curtain came down for good. That mindset is perhaps the only rational explanation for Parker’s decision to put Elvis back on television, despite his embarrassing appearance and reduced abilities. The Colonel tried to explain his seemingly bizarre decision by claiming that Elvis needed a challenge to put some fire in his belly. After all, only two years earlier he had cajoled Presley back onto the road by including a charity concert for Mississippi tornado victims, which seemed to have inspired the King. But, there seems little doubt that Parker saw some serious financial gain in one more TV special and felt he better grab it while he could.

“Parker had the William Morris Agency arrange the deal with CBS, rather than NBC, which had cooled on Elvis despite the success of the 1968 Elvis Comeback Special and the 1973 Aloha satellite extravaganza. CBS, however, happily offered $750,000 for the special, which Elvis and Parker would divide equally, marking the first time the Colonel invoked the 50-50 terms of their new management agreement. The two would share ownership of the show after one repeat airing, and Parker would earn another $10,000 from CBS for his promotional efforts.

William Morris tapped the highly-regarded Gary Smith and Dwight Hemion, of Smith-Hemion Productions, for the job. Hemion held the record for most Emmy Award nominations, and the pair would ultimately win 24 Emmys. They had worked with the likes of Frank Sinatra, Barbra Streisand, Bing Crosby, Bette Midler, Neil Diamond, Steve Lawrence and Eydie Gormé, Sammy Davis Jr., Perry Como, Ann-Margret, and Paul McCartney. The Presley special was an odd assignment for them. ‘Elvis was not that enthusiastic about doing it,’ Smith recalls. ‘The only way that the Colonel could get him to agree to do it, would be if he could just continue doing his concerts; if the special could be totally about capturing his concert and he wouldn’t even have to be involved. For all intents and purposes, he wouldn’t even know there was a special being done.’ The project would be a documentary, not at all like Elvis’ two previous specials, nor the kind of music special typical at the time, and would be built around Elvis and his fans. ‘I was told that this is not with guest stars, and the only way to do it is to do a special that shows him on tour in action.’

Elvis was not to be disturbed or asked to do anything beyond the concerts he was performing. ‘We had one huge production meeting in the Colonel’s office where I had to tell him what we were doing,’ Smith recalls. ‘He opened the meeting by saying, “Remember, nobody is to involve Elvis Presley in this thing. You guys are just showing up and covering the show. He knows you’re doing it, but I don’t want anybody calling him and bothering him.” I was sitting next to Colonel, and I put my hand out, because I’m a very “touchy” person, and I put my hand on his arm, and I started to say, “I assure you, sir . . . ,” and he said, “Get your hands off me, boy. I don’t like to be touched.” He didn’t yell at me, he just said it. I pulled my hand back and said “I’m sorry” half jokingly because everyone was embarrassed for me for a second. He was a huge man; big hands, big arms, and I was really trying to be friendly, and he says “Get your hands off me.” I’ll never forget it. I just continued and said “I assure you that I have heard everything you’ve said about how we have to operate.’” Smith then laid out his documentary approach to shooting an Elvis concert, and he was sure the Colonel liked it. ‘He got flattered. My opinion is that he loved what I had to say because he realized that what I was doing for the first ten minutes of the show was about him, not about the fans. It’s about Colonel Parker. It’s about how he created the aura of Elvis Presley in concert.’”

http://tinyurl.com/mhyaouz  

##

Friday, October 10, 2014

The Two Elvises


There are two enduring images of Elvis Presley.  One presents him as he first appeared on the national scene in 1956, an explosive entertainer, who never stood still, gyrated across stages and television screens, scared the wits out of middle America, and drew its kids to him like a modern-day Pied Piper.  The second image captures him during his final years, decked out in a variety of jumpsuits (although he sometimes wore two-piece suit costumes), when he spent most of his time touring and playing Vegas, and decreasing time in the recording studio. 

There is, of course, a third stereotype that really has no specific physical form, but stands in as the straw man representing Elvis’ years in Hollywood.  Although his film career began with promise, these were mostly lean years during which Presley’s image suffered under the weight of formulaic, lightweight musicals with increasingly banal scripts, and throwaway songs.  They made money for several years and Elvis’ manager, Colonel Tom Parker, maximized profits by combining filming with soundtrack recordings, to the near-exclusion of other recording sessions that might have produced more memorable music.  As it was, while the nation moved to the rebellious music of 1960s rock, Elvis was doing the Clam.  This celluloid image of the King has escaped the stereotyping of the other two, perhaps because Elvis snapped out of it so powerfully in his 1968 “Comeback” television special, Elvis, which was seen as his film career was wheezing to a close and, itself, became perhaps the most iconic moment of the King's career, powerfully preserving him in a leather-and-sweat image.  

The two surviving images of the early and late Elvis eras were crystalized by the U.S. Postal Service, which issued an Elvis commemorative postage stamp in 1992. The Postal Service created two prospective stamp designs: one portraying a youthful Elvis, circa 1956, created by Mark Stutzman, the other in his later jumpsuit persona, painted by John Berkey. The public was asked to vote for the stamp it most preferred, something the Postal Service had never done before and Stutzman’s early Elvis won, hands down.

Of the two iconic images, the older Elvis has taken a sort of beating by stereotype over the years.  Far too many Elvis Impersonators have appeared in jumpsuit costumes, creating a caricature of Elvis.  The image is associated with his last days, which found him well past his prime, overweight, often singing badly, morphing into a kind of self-parody through repetitious concerts.  It is true that Elvis slouched into increasingly identical performances, doing many of the same songs and even repeating the same moves on stage, year after year.  It is a shame that this image is so pervasive among those unfamiliar with the full breadth of the King’s career because Elvis also had some memorable moments in that jumpsuit.  They became increasingly rare, but they were there. 

By all accounts, verified in surviving film footage, his return to the concert stage in 1969 was as impressive, energetic, and unforgettable as his earliest performances in the 1950s.  Two documentary concert films, That’s the Way It Is and Elvis on Tour preserved his electricity on stage in 1970 and 1972 respectively, and also convey the powerful bond that existed between him and his loyal fans.  Footage of his triumphant return to New York in 1972 at Madison Square Garden adds to that record, as do many hours of home movie footage shot by fans and a slew of live concert recordings.  There are plenty of those because the Colonel again sought to maximize profits by combining Elvis’ live shows with the recordings he was contractually obligated to deliver to RCA Records.  It was cheaper and easier to record the concerts at a minimal increased cost and fulfill both the concert dates and the required recordings, just as he did with Elvis’ films and accompanying soundtrack albums.  Eventually, the strategy became a necessity when Elvis proved reluctant to go anywhere near a recording studio and the Colonel was left little alternative. 

As illness and drug abuse set in, there was no telling how well or poorly Elvis might perform on a given evening, but in the final years he rarely approached the heights he had once reached.  Nonetheless, he still had his moments, like the New Year’s Eve show in Pittsburgh in 1976 and even in the final days of his career in mid-1977.  Television cameras captured him during two June 1977 shows, which were a decidedly mixed bag and were used to compile the posthumous TV special Elvis in Concert.  It was no easy task coming up with sufficiently decent material to fill the one-hour TV time slot, which had to be padded with considerable interview footage with Presley fans and scenes of merchandising around the arenas.  Yet Elvis still delivered one of his most memorable performances when he sang “Unchained Melody,” accompanied only by his own piano playing.  By then, he was a shadow of the powerful performer he had once been, his voice was weak at times, he struggled for breath, sweated profusely, but pushed through it with all that he had left, bringing the crowd to its feet for the lengthiest applause of the evening.  Unfortunately, the number was cut from the TV broadcast. 

Like Glen D. Hardin, Elvis' pianist and arranger during most of the concert years, I am an “early Elvis” fan.  I grew up on Elvis' music, movies, and TV appearances of that era, when everything he did seemed like magic and the road ahead seemed filled with promise for him.  But I have learned to appreciate his later career as well, despite its tragedy and shortcomings, and some of the work he turned out during those years. 

Channeling Elvis on Amazon:  http://tinyurl.com/mhyaouz 

U.K Amazon Sales Page:  http://tinyurl.com/kyolbnm

Amazon Authors Page:  http://tinyurl.com/po638bd

Facebook Authors Page:  http://tinyurl.com/pofg47v



Thursday, October 2, 2014

Two Teams

The Baltimore-Washington region has the rare treat of seeing its two major league baseball teams in  postseason play.  Both the Washington Nationals, National League East champions, and the Baltimore Orioles, who won the American League East title, will be battling to get to the World Series and then win it.  Most of us are thrilled at the possibility of a “Beltway World Series” between the two teams or, short of that, seeing one of them win it all, but the postseason has raised some conflicting loyalties.

Two years ago, I anticipated a Beltway series when both teams made it to the postseason, but they both fell in the playoffs.  At the time, I said I’d be glad if either team made it through, but I was then called out on my loyalties and accused of a bit of fair-weather-fandom, too willing to fall behind which ever team proved a winner.  It made me realize that I am and always will be an Orioles fan.  Had the Nats prevailed after the Os were eliminated, it would have made for a nice consolation prize, but they just aren’t my team.  Although I actually live closer to D.C. than Baltimore, the difference in distance is insignificant and not really the point. 

I moved to Washington in 1973, when it no longer had a big league team.  I had to turn northward to Charm City for baseball action and I was soon enjoying games in old Memorial Stadium and following Orioles games on television and radio.  I was impressed with Chuck Thompson’s knowledgeable play-by-play broadcasts and his ability to actually teach listeners about baseball while describing the action on the field.  Memorial Stadium was a friendly sort of retreat, where both players and vendors would talk to anyone and the whole place functioned as a kind of community.  Nothing could match the Earl Weaver years or his charismatic antics and over-the-top tantrums and face-offs with umpires.  He’s the only manager I’ve seen who got louder applause from the hometown fans than any of his players when the Orioles were introduced prior to World Series games.  We all enjoyed Wild Bill Hagy’s antics in Section 34 and he became our cheerleader during the high times of 1979, 1982, and 1983.  Like him, we also stuck around during the lean years, when there wasn’t much to cheer about.  And, when the Os went to the postseason, we had no trouble getting tickets to those games too, even if we did end up in the nosebleed seats.  At every game I attended, I invariably sat next to a total stranger with whom I would end up talking baseball throughout the game.  Coming from New York, I was impressed with the way Orioles fans applauded opposing players when they made an outstanding play, although their derision of those who erred was merciless.  How would you like to drop a fly ball and have 30,000 people point at you while chanting "You! You! You!"?  Baseball’s changed a lot since then.  But, even though Camden Yards is a different sort of place with a different vibe, it’s still home to the Orioles and is about to host another postseason campaign.  Weaver, Hagy, the Orioles of the 80s and many of their fans may be gone, but the team is still there – and so am I.

Oh, I wish the Nats well and I would be happy to see them advance, too, but I spent too many years in a baseball-less D.C. to shift to their side now, especially after the decades of joy and aggravation I’ve shared with the Orioles.  The nation’s capital has never struck me as a baseball town, despite the enthusiasm it has shown toward the Nats, which I applaud.  Many area fans never took to the Orioles and they have embraced the Nats, as they should.  But I still see Washington as a town that is mainly obsessed with its NFL team and talk of it never ceases.  The local media has catered to that and, for those who aren’t really football fans or who may not care for the local franchise (particularly its name, which many regard as offensive), it leaves the impression that baseball will always be secondary.  It’s tough for fans to remain enthusiastic or patient during extended periods of team failure or rebuilding and only time will tell how well Nats fans endure that. 

But, I wish the Nats well – until they meet the Orioles in the World Series and are totally thumped!  After all, you would not have expected Brooklyn Dodgers fans to root for the Yankees when they went to the World Series and the Bums didn’t!